I'd almost guarantee that's WG's biggest cash haul of the year. All we have to do is examine the absolute insanity that is Santa crates. But if we all want to really take a hard look in the mirror about why WOWS has increasingly gone towards the loot box revenue grab. That's the only really unique thing about this event IMO. It is good that they listened about locking something important behind a loot box only, at least this time. That being said, I'm already playing the game so I will happily complete the Missouri campaign and get the free stuff they are offering. In the interest of full disclosure, I got Missouri when it first came out. Also you now now what it will cost you to get it. After the Puerto Rico debacle, even the subsequent dockyard stages are easy to complete. I have no beef with the dedicated F2P players but by definition they aren't ever going pay for it regardless of how it is available so Wargaming isn't concerned about their opinion on this matter.Īlso despite the new howling, it isnt the first time Wargaming has expected people to buy and do some grinding to get a ship. My opinion will change if they insert bizarre or hard to complete requirements, but they haven't done that in the past for a campaign. Anyone who is going to buy Missouri is actually playing the game and can probably complete the missions easily. They were convinced to give a fairer alternative to the crappy loot boxes, but they want to tie it to one of the cheesy campaigns that you usually can sleepwalk through.

You complete them while playing the game normally. Then they open it for purchase if you complete a campaign but people still howl.Īdmittedly, we don't know what the missions are, but the fact they called it a 'campaign' suggests it is the same as the previous campaigns - sink 5 ships, spot 20 torpedoes, etc. People howled about the loot boxes, which is understandable because you have no idea what you actually have to do to get the ship. not sure what you all are griping about this for? Hasn't everyone already committed to closing your wallets anyway? Why gripe about any of this if you aren't going to give anymore money to WG? I mean all the mission will be is a way for F2P or protest (while still playing) players to get some of WG's free stuff. I guess I would have to see what the mission requirements look like before deciding how bad this is really? Though.

Missouri world of warship